On 6/16/2016 2:46 PM, mike wilson wrote:
On 16 June 2016 at 17:58 John <[email protected]> wrote:
On 6/16/2016 11:09 AM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
Dan,
I would call that photo "relics" or "defuncts", depending on the mood. :-)
John,
As for that new machine, - I'd say, it's some 20-years too late.
It could've been a big hit in 1996 (assuming it would had been working
well).
Igor
Wouldn't work for everyone.
I still enjoy using film, but I no longer have any reasonably convenient
way to process it. I've got no room for a darkroom.
A daylight machine that cost less than a new camera body, handles
multiple processes & can be used without a dedicated darkroom would
appeal to me. I don't think I'm the only photographer who enjoyed the
process of turning film into images.
Bet it would be a BIG HIT with hipsters.
Hipsters will use a manual Jobo, with the tanks heated by solid fuel.
Those manual Jobos were made of plastic, if you use solid fuel, you risk
turning the Jobo into solid fuel...
--
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve
immortality through not dying.
-- Woody Allen
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
