> On 16 June 2016 at 17:58 John <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 6/16/2016 11:09 AM, Igor PDML-StR wrote: > > > > > > Dan, > > > > I would call that photo "relics" or "defuncts", depending on the mood. :-) > > > > John, > > As for that new machine, - I'd say, it's some 20-years too late. > > It could've been a big hit in 1996 (assuming it would had been working > > well). > > > > Igor > > Wouldn't work for everyone. > > I still enjoy using film, but I no longer have any reasonably convenient > way to process it. I've got no room for a darkroom. > > A daylight machine that cost less than a new camera body, handles > multiple processes & can be used without a dedicated darkroom would > appeal to me. I don't think I'm the only photographer who enjoyed the > process of turning film into images. > > Bet it would be a BIG HIT with hipsters.
Hipsters will use a manual Jobo, with the tanks heated by solid fuel. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
