Stan, thanks for taking the time to spell it out in detail.
I'll note it for the future needs.
Quoted below is the critical point in all this adjustment procedure in
LR. It actually crossed my mind that it might do that way, but I hesitated
a bit... I should have tested on a small subset, but being in a hurry and
preoccupied with a few other tasks on hand, I chose a "sure shot" method.
Adobe could have done a better job in making it less ambiguous.
When the "Type of Adjustment" lists:
"Adjust to a specified date and time", and another item says
"*SHIFT* by set number of hours ...",
why would one think that it does not set the time to THE SPECIFIED date
and time, despite what is written?!
And there could be reasons why one would want to set multiple photos to
the same specific (=absolute) date and time.
Again, thanks for decrypting LR-speak. ;-)
Igor
PS. Now I am thinking that I might have used that functionality once, at
some point in the distant past.
Stanley Halpin Fri, 10 Mar 2017 07:43:07 -0800 wrote:
Et voila, all 100 images have their metadata adjusted by the equivalent
amount relative to their start point. This is the key point: the changes
you make to the first selection are applied relative to each image’s
start point, NOT absolutely.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
