Hmm, but that only accounts for 6 lost frames no? Or perhaps it skips other 000 instances, like from 999 to 001?
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote: > One of my many quirks is to set my "name field" on my camera to be my > initials, and then a digit that represents how many times the 10,000 counter > has turned over. On this last trip both cameras that I brought "rolled > over". In the process of reconciling the file names I noticed that the last > image file was 20170827-LRC61567 while the metadata said the shutter count > was 61507. My first thought was that with LV images the shutter would only > open once per set of frames rather than once per frame. But that was wrong. > > When the counter rolls over, it goes from 9999 to 0001, skipping 0000. The > sixty "lost" frames were 10000, 20000, 30000 ... > > -- > Larry Colen [email protected] (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- -- Photography takes an instant out of time, altering life by holding it still. Dorothea Lange -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
