Dark frame subtractions, live view actuations, and the additional exposures from a multiple exposure may also count as shutter actuations that aren't justified by an image file.
regards, Anthony On 30 August 2017 at 12:23, Igor PDML-StR <pdml...@komkon.org> wrote: > > > Besides "no-card" activations, I wonder if it might also count those > actuations when you check the WB. And checking for the dust... > > > John Francis Tue, 29 Aug 2017 16:51:08 -0700 wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 09:23:09AM -0700, Larry Colen wrote: > >> >> >> Gonz wrote: >> > Hmm, but that only accounts for 6 lost frames no? Or perhaps it skips >> > other 000 instances, like from 999 to 001? >> > > > I was wondering when somebody else would notice that ... > > d'Oh! >> >> >> I wonder if bracketing in Live View would do it. >> > > I rather doubt that - I find it hard to imagine anything that would only > result in a deficit of 50-60 frames if it was related to any mode setting > on the camera. It would have to be something you only do once in every > thousand exposures. > > > > > On Mon, 28 Aug 2017, Igor PDML-StR wrote: > > >> Wow! >> The infamous "off-by-one" error in a somewhat unusual incarnation. :-) >> >> While I was reading your thriller, my guess was it would be due to the >> shutter activations without a card in the slot. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Igor >> >> >> > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
