i don't have much experience in shooting butterflies and already i
realise it's a problem. none of the butterflies allowed me to come
anywhere near half a metre yesterday and hence the 200mm was useful.
all my butterfly photos are heavily cropped so a high res aps-c camera
will certainly come in useful. my son, who was shooting with a k-s1
(20mp as opposed to the k-x's 12mp) and the 55-300 has got better

i am planning to experiment with the fa 100/2.8. i also have a sigma
apo 70-300, with a 'macro' which can go down to 1:2 and i am planning
to see how that also goes. i am hoping one out of the two clicks....

On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 15:38:30 +0200
Henk Terhell <hterh...@chello.nl> wrote:

> This for me is a dilemma when shooting butterflies, whether to use a 
> macro lens or a telelens, and APS-C or FF.
> Some butterflies allow you to get as close as 1/2 meter. However
> others in the field are easily disturbed if approaching.
> With a macro lens as the FA 100/2.8 or Tamron 90/2.8A, a high res
> APS-C camera  may be more suitable for its reach therefore than the
> K-1. And the effective resolution of the K-1 with a DA-lens may be
> about 16 MP, similar as of the K5, so not gaining anything.
> Would be glad to hear experience from others.
> Henk
> Op 2018-09-10 om 13:53 schreef Subash Jeyan:
> > On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 07:24:58 -0400
> > "J.C. O'Connell" <hifis...@gate.net> wrote:
> >  
> >> nice. Does the DA 50-200 have a macro mode?  
> > no. it has a close-focussing distance of about 1.1 metre. most of
> > the 50-200 shots were taken with the K-x. i plan to use the fa
> > 100/2.8 in future, mostly with the K-x also.

PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to