>Exactly. Still, people more frequently chose EOS300 instead of MZ-5n. Why?
I don't really know. But I would imagine they didn't compared the EOS with MZ/ZX bodies side-by-side. By the truth is, I do not know. :( >IMHO "professional level camera" means "the camera used mostly by >professional photographers". And "professional photographers" means for me >"the >guys for whom photography is a job". There is a thing called "standard". >Whatever one would say about Pentax, Canon, Nikon, Minolta and other >brands, >EOS1V and F5 became "standard cameras" for those professional >photographers, who stick to the 35mm format. >From what I have read so far, Canon T90 was used by many professional due to its design (even though it was not marketed as a professional model). Should it be considered professional? regards, Alan Chan _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
