If it's anything like what I get, it's not crap, just 90% duplicates of the same
image with only minor variation.
If I take a thousand photos in one session, there's only a hundred or so
individual "subjects". But I have to go through all of them to determine which
of the dozen or so duplicates of each "subject" shot is the best of the batch.
Now of that hundred or so individual "subjects" maybe some of them are not as
good as I first envisioned them, but I find my percentage of keepers is a lot
better than it was in film days when I might have to wait a week or more to see
what I got.
Doesn't completely eliminate crap images, with digital most of my crap images
are technically excellent.
On 12/10/2019 18:06:50, Jan van Wijk wrote:
Hi Alan,
On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 18:35:52 +0200 Alan C wrote:
3300. Good gracious!
About half of them is crap anyway :)
Regards, JvW
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jan van Wijk; http://www.dfsee.com/gallery
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
