Hi John, On Thu, 12 Dec 2019 11:54:40 -0500 John wrote: > >If it's anything like what I get, it's not crap, just 90% duplicates of the >same image with only minor variation. > >If I take a thousand photos in one session, there's only a hundred or so >individual "subjects". But I have to go through all of them to determine which >of the dozen or so duplicates of each "subject" shot is the best of the batch.
On dedicated fotoshoots yes, that's usually how it goes with me too. However, for travel photography, there are often situations where there is little time, or you are shooting from a driving car or other 'difficult' situations, that makes the technical 'keeper rate' go down a bit, and not many 'almost duplicates' are available :) >Now of that hundred or so individual "subjects" maybe some of them are not as >good as I first envisioned them, but I find my percentage of keepers is a lot better than it was in film days when I might have to wait a week or more to see what I got. > >Doesn't completely eliminate crap images, with digital most of my crap images >are technically excellent. True, often enough .. >On 12/10/2019 18:06:50, Jan van Wijk wrote: >>>3300. Good gracious! >>About half of them is crap anyway :) Regards, JvW ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jan van Wijk; http://www.dfsee.com/gallery -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
