> From: Cotty 
> Subject: My reasons for wanting digital (was: Re: OT: Read this
before you spend all your $$$....) 
> Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2002 15:29:51 -0700 

cotty,

sorry to hear about your scanner. been there, know how it feels. 
but, see, for the money D60 body alone costs at b&h, one can buy at the
same place nikon 8000ed, or minolta dimage whatever (and, in that case,
have money left for beer). 

> (Don't talk about ICE - if I could afford a decent scanner, it still 
> wouldn't get past the printer. Links in a chain, eh?)

no matter, scanned  film or digital, you cannot eliminate the printer
from the chain. and, yes, digital ice really works <g>

<rant>
unfortunately, *for me* , digital cannot replace 35mm -- there's no way
i can have equivalent of 10 rolls of film sit in my backpack (that's
what, at 6 MPixels, ~7GB uncompressed?). and before anyone tells me
that with digital i could decide what to keep nad what not right at the
spot, i should point out that 
(1) i don't usually have a 21 inch monitor in my pocket.
(2) in general, shooting and editing at the same time is wrong, as
wrong as deciding what kind of frame you want for your picture, right
at the spot.
</rant>

but, whatever works for you. don't let me stop you from switching to
canon -- just make sure you announce selling your pentax gear on the
list first <vbg>

best,

mishka
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to