> On 24 Nov 2021, at 07:32, mike wilson <m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 24 November 2021 at 04:47 John Francis <jo...@panix.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> The Olympus rig is only a little lighter than the Pentax;
>> while the lens is significantly lighter (even though it's
>> f2.8, not f4), the OM-D body is actually quite a bit heavier
>> than the K5. (The K3 is heaver than the K5, too, but still
>> significantly lighter than the OM-D M1X, even with a grip).
> 
> I was rather curious about this.  For decades, Pentax was agreed to be the 
> lightest and petitest of the major manufacturers, generally without a lack of 
> facility.  I can remember discussions here about it being one of the 
> attractants.  It will be interesting to see if you decide that the saving in 
> mass was worth the expenditure.
> --
> %(

A few months ago I bought a used Panasonic GX8 as a second body alongside my 
Olympus E-M1 Mk II. It was like new with only about seven hundred shutter 
clicks, and was about half the price I’d seen advertised elsewhere. 

It very quickly became the camera I reach for first as it’s much, much smaller, 
lighter and more simple than the Oly. I subsequently bought some used and 
cosmetically ugly, but optically sound, Panasonic lenses (12-35/2.8, 
35-100/2.8) which are much lighter and easier to handle than the M.Zuiko 
12-40/2.8, and a new 50/1.7.

I like this kit so much that I’ve bought a second mint GX8, with even fewer 
shutter clicks (just over 400) than the other one, at an even lower price, and 
plan to sell the E-M1 and that lens, along with a few other bits of Olympus kit.

I realise the GX8 is probably not the camera for someone like John, but for me 
it’s a really good find.

Hello again, by the way. I seem to have gone awol from the PDML for a couple of 
months, but messages started coming through again yesterday.

--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to