> On 23 Jan 2024, at 01:54, Godfrey DiGiorgi <godfreydigio...@me.com> wrote: > > > Hmm. I like to keep the camera's date setting current, but rarely ever look > at the time my cameras are set to. > I order things in LR by frame number, not by time, and only very very > occasionally use more than one camera at a time, so it's rarely an issue. > > If I do have two cameras output (iphone and m10m, or m10m and m10r), since I > don't shoot all that many frames in a session on average, I can usually > integrate all the photos together in the right sequence and then rename them > into an ordinal sequence, if that seems important. I can also set the capture > times into an ordinal range that way. > > Most of the time, I don't worry about time and date very much. Once I've > rendered my photos and put together a set to display, whatever order they are > in is what I choose, not what the frame numbering or the time/date sequence > are. > > Life is sure simpler in the Polaroid instant film world where a pack of film > has only eight exposures and I can remember exactly what sequence I shot them > in… :D
There’s a lot to be said for that! I’ve just discovered that the Visoflex 020 has a GPS. So attached to my M10M, and after changing a couple of settings in the menu, it can pluck the date and time from out of the sky! As far as I can tell it uses local time, but as I’m in the UTC time zone it’s difficult to be sure. -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
