Hi, er, no, you can't assume that. I have no intention of giving up my film cameras (not all SLRs). At the moment I have no intention of buying digital stuff either, but I like to think about the possibilities. If DV is good enough, there would be no need to buy a stills digital camera, instead you could kill 2 birds with one stone - I'm quite interesting in trying video sometime.
--- Bob mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Monday, July 22, 2002, 10:49:10 AM, you wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Bob Walkden wrote: >> I can see a lot of advantages to shooting a burst of >> video rather than a few frames of stills, and if it's easy to get a >> high quality still out of the video burst, I wonder why anybody would >> use a stills camera if they have a DV camera like this? It seems to me >> that this turns on the issue of the quality of the output. Does >> anybody know how the quality of these things compares with high-end >> digital stills cameras? Any other issues to consider? > Hallo Bob! > (pause) :-( > so,...., I can assume that you are dumping the film SLRs going for > digital. > OK,.... please go ahead. > :-( > Wish you all the best. > Ayash. > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
