>You bring up some excellent points that are worthy of consideration. >The age of the LX bodies perhaps is the primary cause for problems. >The one fact remains that they are all OLD cameras and will continue >to have old camera problems. Perhaps far less than some other old >cameras, but problems nonetheless.
But that doesn't explan why some bodies have received much more complains than others. >Let's hope that on the 35mm front, the MZ-S proves to be a reliable >body. I suspect that it doesn't make economic sense for a company to >build a very expensive body that will last and last. No new sales >that way. So my guess is that the MZ-S will not hold up as well or >long as the LX. I actually thinks the opposite. People want quality products and they would buy more if they were satisfied. People would stay away forever if they got bitten. My sister's lecturer (engineer) once said, "No matter how reliable certain products are in general, if yours was a lemon, you would never have the same faith on that brand anymore." This is especially true when you bought their top of the line products, just turned out to be a nightmare to fix. It's not just money, but endless frustration. regards, Alan Chan _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
