Shaun wrote:
> Perhaps another flagship so soon would appear foolish, however, it may be an > expedient way of recovering some of the development cost that went into the > stalled MZ-D. Sell the converted (i.e. us) a new 'flagship' SLR essentially > based on a digital SLR design that didn't fly, while all the while having > other development plans. This is pretty much what some of us were being told by insiders about the MZ-S awhile back. The decision to make a film camera (MZ-S) of the digital prototype came out of the blue, apparently delayed other slr developments to much internal dismay. P�l
