I think you're having me on, aren't ya, laddie! Now usually we'd usually go for "3 x" to indicate a three times zoom or multiplication action. Yes, I've seen 3 * 4, as in = 12. But still, it was a bit of a wonder... Well, never mind, Rob. It's quite clear now what you meant. I was thinking it was my email application, messing something up. ;^)
Problem solved <g> keith Rob Brigham wrote: > > No, th* s*nt*nc* was r*lay*d to you OK. > > I did finish th* s*nt*nc* with 3 *, as 1n 3 times z00m! We had been > talking about 4 * and 3 * zooms previously so I didn't include the word > 'z**m'. > > Hope you get your pro&l*m$ $0rt*d! > > R%b > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Keith Whaley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 17 September 2002 16:19 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Optio 330 GS announced > > > > > > Hi Rob, > > > > Rob Brigham wrote: > > > > > > Yeah I know the RS, but the trouble is it doesn't have a flip out > > > screen and only has 3*. > > > > The above sentence ends in "three asterisk" in the ASCII text > > of my email software. What character did you intend the > > asterisk to be? Or, was it meant to be an asterisk? :@( > > > > I've been getting that asterisk symbol inserted in text, or > > replacing a character of some sort, from time to time, and > > it's usually associated with some MIME interference. > > > > Anyhow, I'm gathering data, to see if I can figure out what's > > happening. > > > > Thanks! > > > > keith whaley > > > > > Plus IO have heard MANY people saying that the > > > sharpening algorithm in particular is absolute trash. I > > have actually > > > looked around today, and the lens is not well regarded either, so > > > perhaps I will have to betray Pentax after all. I am still > > surprised > > > that there has been no mention of a 430 GS - perhaps they > > are saving > > > that one for the show!! > > > > = snipped = > > > >
