I know the next items I would buy are FA31/1.8 & FA*200/2.8, unless Pentax released a FA*70-210/4 1st. :) Due to the uncertainly caused by the digital technology, I just don't feel right to buy another film camera even though I like the MZ-S, or my backup MX dead tomorrow. :(
regards, Alan Chan > What's all this about a "flagship" camera? Isn't the MZ-S the flagship of > the line? It's the dream camera that appears to have been designed with > most of the hopes of the PDMLers in mind. What's it missing, a removable > finder? 10fps winder? > > I'm happy that Pentax has a camera to compete with the F100 and EOS-3. The > MZ-S does all that I ask of it, has build quality to be proud of, and is > friendly enough that you could just hug it. Does anyone really want Pentax > to make an F5 equivalent, that costs twice the price of an MZ-S and takes 8 > AA batteries? For that money, just grab a 67II and be done. Most top pros > shooting fashion and portraits are shooting medium format anyway. N***n and > C***n don't even try to compete in that field. Do their list members beat > their chests over that? I doubt it.
