On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Nick Wright wrote: > I've been kindof thinking about this too. But I've > been thinking more along the lines of medfo lenses > with USM. Think about it... a 645 or even 67 lens with > a USM driven AF.
I think you'd need an AF 67, first.. But yeah. I actually forgot the USM idea that was being thrown around, as well. Again, who else has AF 645 cameras? Quite a few.. but who has a silent, quick focus 645? No one. Its a wide open market. -- http://www.infotainment.org "The destructive character is cheerful." - Walter Benjamin
