Well I remember a few years ago, someone here posed
the question as to why Pentax had not introduced an AF
67 camera. I believe the general consensus was
something along the lines that the motor required to
focus such large lenses would be much too big for the
camera body. But with USM the motor is in the lenses
and are much smaller. Not to mention that each motor
would be ideallized for the lens that it was in.

Nick Wrigh

--- gfen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

*snip*

> I think you'd need an AF 67, first.. But yeah. I
> actually forgot the USM
> idea that was being thrown around, as well.


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

Reply via email to