I'm not arguing about the sworn statement part. When accompanied by a sworn statement, it possesses different value in courts is what I am saying.
I'm not saying one is inadmissable, or one is always better, or one cannot be used without sworn statement, or ... ... ... I'm just saying they are viewed differently. Read carefully. --- Herb Chong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Message text written by > INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >This is not a seminal point about whether one has a > relationship to reality more than the other. > However, > wet photographs are valued differently than digital > photographs in courts. > > < > > no they are not. they have no value whatsoever > without a sworn statement > from the photographer saying that the photograph > accurately depicts what > they saw when they were present at the scene to take > the picture. > > Herb... > ===== Chaso DeChaso "Less is more cheap" - Osvaldo Valdes, Architect __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site http://webhosting.yahoo.com/
