As a trial attorney, I strongly disagree with your statement of the law. Chaso DeChaso wrote:
> I'm not arguing about the sworn statement part. When > accompanied by a sworn statement, it possesses > different value in courts is what I am saying. > I'm not saying one is inadmissable, or one is always > better, or one cannot be used without sworn statement, > or ... ... ... I'm just saying they are viewed > differently. Read carefully.
