Agreed. I'd like it applied to the argument at hand, though, which would be (translated): film isn't less authentic than digital because nothing exists anyway, nothing is true, nothing is objective, etc. Then we have the crux on the table. Then we can make progress.
--- "Daniel J. Matyola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Many great philosophers have made that precise > point. > > Chaso DeChaso wrote: > > > All of these are excellent points (and beautifully > > stated, by the way) but most can also be applied > to > > seeing - to how our eyes receive, alter, etc. what > is > > around us. Consequently, if such as the below are > the > > key points of argument, then one must also begin > an > > argument that what you see can never be believed > at > > all and has always been fiction. > ===== Chaso DeChaso "Less is more cheap" - Osvaldo Valdes, Architect __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site http://webhosting.yahoo.com/
