On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, [iso-8859-1] P�l Jensen wrote: > Apart from the obvious differences there is the DOF issue. Less DOF at > the same image size. I can personally see that the 67 could be a
Actually, that's a thought that never occured to me.. and the fact that I'm driven to have teh shallowest DOF I can find for most things.. Well, hey. > problem for my shooting style. Also, I personally believe that 645 is > history. No doubt that another digital format standard is emerging > with the 6X4,5 format). I'm not convinced the 6X7 will. I have no intentions of moving to a digital solution in the near future. I have no desire to. While I do all my post-work on a computer now, its only because I have no money or time to try and set up a dark room now, and my last efforts were curtailed.
