No, I meant I thought there was a 55 LS or something thereabouts. Guess not.
tv > -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:bkdayton@;rcsis.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 8:18 PM > To: tom > Subject: Re[2]: Oh, 645! revisited: 645x67. > > > Not wide enough. I have both leaf shutter lenses and I would like > something wider than the 90. But I will admit that I am able to get > away with worse shadows in large groups than in very small > groups - so > the 90 (45 in 35mm) isn't so bad. > > > Bruce > > > > Thursday, October 17, 2002, 5:05:00 PM, you wrote: > > >> The 645 has a 75 and 135 LS. > >> > >> That would be a pretty close match for the 90mm (discontinued) > >> and the 165mm lenses for the 6x7. > > t> I thought there was a wide-angle too? > > t> tv >
