Paul, You drew attention to my comments I thought you wrote. I found the problem. It was not you at all. I apologize. The actual person is [EMAIL PROTECTED] who made the comment:
>I've enough education that I'm not impressed by a PhD. I don't know why you >would sign your name with So-and-So, PhD. unless you were looking for work or >self impressed with your achievements. We don't have ranks in the pdml >(except for Doug Brewer who is the General! <g>) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 9:31 PM Subject: Re: 200mm F/4 SMC-A macro > > > Brad wrote: > > Wow, this coming from Paul Stenquist? I should take it seriously then, > > considering your remarks make here just recently eh? > > > > > Yes Brad, as numerous members of the PDML have suggested, you should > take it seriously. By the way the remarks you attributed to me in your > last post were not mine. I rarely speak with anger here. There's really > no reason to do so, is there? I consider this issue closed. We have > informed both you and Shaun of a longstanding agreement that perhaps > neither of you were aware of. Shaun has indicated he will abide by it > even if he doesn't necessarily agree with it. If you choose not to, so > be it. But let's move on. > Paul Stenquist >
