"Bill D. Casselberry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Mark Roberts wrote: > >> ... so I tried out a roll of Kodak T400CN ... It does indeed seem >> to be much more scanner friendly than the traditional stuff. My >> question is: Can anyone tell me how the Ilford chromogenic films >> compare to the Kodak stuff? > > I have used all of them except the new Portra B&W and found > the TMax400CN to be the best - IMHO, of course. Wheatfield > reports that the Ilford is much more suscepible to physical > damage due to its "softness", not a good thing if getting > moderate cost processing.
Thnaks Bill. That's just the kind of information I'm looking for. Since my Minolta Scan Multi sandwiches the neg between two glass plates (anti-newton-ring type), I expect resistance to physical damage should be something to which I give consideration. -- Mark Roberts www.robertstech.com Photography and writing
