Didn't Kodak kill T400CN? I notice the NY mail order houses have it in stock, put maybe that's just what's left in the channel.
t On 11/3/02 9:59 AM, Paul Jones wrote: > I found the T400CN to be a good all round film and it scans quite well, > although i like XP2 Super for portraits, it gives a really nice look to the > subjects skin. I also find the XP2 Super easier to print in a real dark > room. I noted what william said about the soft emulsion and have been extra > carefull with it. > > I also find the Fuji Acros scans very well. > > Regards, > Paul Jones > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mark Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 12:20 PM > Subject: Chromogenic B&W > > >> Although I much prefer the look of traditional B&W film, I'd been told > that the >> chromogenic stuff scans much better so I tried out a roll of Kodak T400CN >> (photos at http://www.robertstech.com/frick.htm if anyone's interested). > It does >> indeed seem to be much more scanner friendly than the traditional stuff. > My >> question is: Can anyone tell me how the Ilford chromogenic films compare > to the >> Kodak stuff? I might end up shooting more of this kind of thing. >> >> -- >> Mark Roberts >> www.robertstech.com >> Photography and writing >> >
