On Sat, Sep 17, 2005, Robby Russell wrote: > I agree. There is no reason for any us vs them... because, I bet quite a > few of "us" will sign up on both lists. The best approach would be to > leave an open door and let anyone who decides to leave know that they > are welcome here. :-)
Definitely. I'll be both places. > I also think it should be clear though that the topic of *Rails* would > still be welcomed within PDX.rb, as would anything Ruby-related. Right? > There is also no reason why PDX.rb can't be, "simple, agile, small, and > fun!" as well. :-) > It doesn't take much to set or change the tone of any collective of > people. Being adaptable is an important trait of each person and group. > With a little bit of common sense, courtesy, and fun... I don't see why > PDX.rb couldn't consist of all these traits. In the past week, I've > worked with a small handful of people on a few small projects that were > directly for the benefit of PDX.rb. Everyone was polite, fun, and > excited about what they were helping with. I hope that the hackfest > today is yet another good thing to happen... all in about a weeks time > since the email war last week. I think as the last couple of weeks has shown, the more we talk about something, the more annoying said thing gets. I personally support the SIG idea, but what the hell. One way or the other, the two groups will be tightly coupled (oh noes, refactor!) and we're all friends here. Ben _______________________________________________ PDXRuby mailing list [email protected] IRC: #pdx.rb on irc.freenode.net http://lists.pdxruby.org/mailman/listinfo/pdxruby
