Dave,

Not using Textdrive and not seeing the error message, it is difficult
to help you.  Can you post the issues you are having?  If you are
using a hosting provider, and they recommend doing something, there
might be a good reason for following their advice.  However, it could
just be that they have not added documentation to support mongrel
which is IMHO the state of the art deployment scenario for rails.

Rails on Fastcgi+Lighttpd is very tightly-coupled, and therefore
debugging is difficult when something goes wrong, as you might now be
experiencing.  Rails+Mongrel+Apache/Pound is not; you can easily
deploy one of them and test independently, and then add more servers
to your cluster when you want to scale, among other things.

Chris

On 10/23/06, Dave Amos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>My first advice would be to drop lighttpd and use mongrel plus pound
>or apache.  Is there a reason you want to use lighttpd?  Fastcgi?

I'm using lighttpd because I'm using Textdrive as a hosting provider and
they seem to strongly recommend it.  They even have a tutorial and
everything, which I followed to the "T" and still had problems.  I'd switch
to Mongrel, but since I've never deployed an app before I kind of needed
some serious handholding.  What are the reasons for choosing mongrel or
apache over lighttpd?  Apache would be pretty convenient, actually, since  I
work for a website that uses apache, so I can ask one of the developers for
help.

Thanks!

Dave

_______________________________________________
PDXRuby mailing list
[email protected]
IRC: #pdx.rb on irc.freenode.net
http://lists.pdxruby.org/mailman/listinfo/pdxruby


_______________________________________________
PDXRuby mailing list
[email protected]
IRC: #pdx.rb on irc.freenode.net
http://lists.pdxruby.org/mailman/listinfo/pdxruby

Reply via email to