hi Hannes, On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Hannes Magnusson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Johannes Schlüter > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Rasmus, >> >> On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 08:39 -0800, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: >>> I saw your request, but yes, I ignored it waiting for some sort of >>> confirmation from the existing module maintainer, or even a hint from >>> you that you had contacted the existing maintainer. We don't just >>> randomly give people commit access to other peoples' code with some ack >>> from them. >> >> Lars Strojny supported him in a thread where Pieter de Zwar was quoted >> and on CC. So I assume it's ok. (But I don't have the powers needed) > > I ignore all pecl requests too (well, expect the obvious ones that > should be rejected) since I don't have peclweb admin karma and > wouldn't be able to give them access to peclweb.
Well, that's the main issue. The problem is not to approve but to get people related to a request to care about it. Like confirming the validity of the request, review patches, etc. Approving requests take no time for new approved packages or packages with active or living developers. > He raises a good point though, over the past couple of years there > isn't really anyone that is actively reviewing and approving the pecl > requests.. Wrong, but complaining as soon as one request takes longer than usual is getting a habit. > I'm actually a bit unsure who even has peclweb admin access.. Quite some people. Dropping pecl only accounts will however help a bit and simplify the whole thing, using only master as auth and maintainers list. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye -- PECL development discussion Mailing List (http://pecl.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
