On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Hannes Magnusson < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Johannes Schlüter > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Rasmus, > > > > On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 08:39 -0800, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > >> I saw your request, but yes, I ignored it waiting for some sort of > >> confirmation from the existing module maintainer, or even a hint from > >> you that you had contacted the existing maintainer. We don't just > >> randomly give people commit access to other peoples' code with some ack > >> from them. > > > > Lars Strojny supported him in a thread where Pieter de Zwar was quoted > > and on CC. So I assume it's ok. (But I don't have the powers needed) > > I ignore all pecl requests too (well, expect the obvious ones that > should be rejected) since I don't have peclweb admin karma and > wouldn't be able to give them access to peclweb. > > He raises a good point though, over the past couple of years there > isn't really anyone that is actively reviewing and approving the pecl > requests.. > I'm actually a bit unsure who even has peclweb admin access.. > > -Hannes > > Based on your and Johannes' contribution to the project I think that there is no reason why you shouldn't be able to approve pecl requests. I've added Johannes to the list of people allowed to approve svn/git accounts (he has karma for the whole repo anyways, and considering he is an RM, I think it is a pretty safe call), and I also set the admin flag for your peclweb account so you can also manage the pecl account requests from now on. If anybody disagrees with any of these actions feel free to revert and explain the possible reasons. -- Ferenc Kovács @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
