Thanks for the reply Harry,
I don't think this is the issue. Some of the successfully compiled
parts have longer names than those showing this problem. Some exhibiting the
problem are amongst the shorter part names within the libraries.
Guess I will post it to the DXP forum and see what those there have to
suggest.
Sincerely,
Brad Velander
Senior PCB Designer
Northern Airborne Technology
1925 Kirschner Rd.,
Kelowna, BC, V1Y 4N7.
tel (250) 763-2329 ext. 225
fax (250) 762-3374
-----Original Message-----
From: Harry Selfridge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 29, 2005 11:42 PM
To: Protel EDA Discussion List
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Porting P99SE libraries to DXP
This rings a bell - are your misbehaving component names being truncated by
any chance? I seem to remember a problem with long part names getting
characters dropped, and that confuses the compiler. I may not be recalling
the circumstances correctly, but I remember an issue with the length of the
component name field at some point.
____________________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum
To Post messages:
mailto:[email protected]
Unsubscribe and Other Options:
http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com
Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
