Hmmm, sounds as though another DXP licence is the best way forward. We are doing some contracted work and the customer has had Protel forever, so won't they be pleased. Cheaper than us both struggling over DXP to P99 I suspect. I'll leave you all to do some work now. Thanks again.
Rob R`theta Electronics -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Condit Sent: 11 September 2007 00:07 To: 'Protel EDA Discussion List' Subject: Re: [PEDA] DXP PCB -> 99SE Sorry, I meant P99SE, not P98SE. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Gillatt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Jeff Condit'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Protel EDA Discussion List'" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 2:23 PM Subject: RE: [PEDA] DXP PCB -> 99SE > > I thought P99SE was just P98SE with a few patches, you are saying that > they > are different beasts and that DXP is closer to 98 than it is to 99. > Our DXP, I think, is something like 6.3. The "about" menu tells me it is > DXP2004. I'll have to check with the systems guy to be sure. > > Thanks again, > Rob > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On > Behalf Of Jeff Condit > Sent: 10 September 2007 21:57 > To: Protel EDA Discussion List > Subject: Re: [PEDA] DXP PCB -> 99SE > > > Bob, > > I have Altium Designer 6.7 up and running. In a pinch I could try > loading your DXP design into AD6.7 and than save it as file version 4. > However, I haven't done this a lot and so cannot vouch that everything > would make it through intact. You'd still have to look it over in > P99SE. I think it would be better if you could go directly from DXP > to P98SE as they are much more closely related. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steve Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Jeff Condit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Protel EDA Discussion List" > <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 9:43 AM > Subject: RE: [PEDA] DXP PCB -> 99SE > > >> Good luck with that. The primary reason we upgraded to DXP from 99SE >> was that we had an outside source do a design for us in DXP and when >> we brought them back into 99SE we had major problems with the file >> being readable by 99SE. It literally took many multiple attempts to >> open the file in 99SE, if it would open at all. >> >> >> Regards, >> Steve Smith >> Product Engineer >> Staco Energy Products Co. >> Web Site: www.stacoenergy.com >> & www.stacopower.com >> >> DISCLAIMER AND/OR CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: >> This message, including any attached materials, is intended solely >> for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and >> may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt >> from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this >> electronic mail transmission is not the intended recipient, you are >> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of >> this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this >> communication in error, please e-mail or call Staco Energy Products >> Co. at (937) 253-1191. Thank you for your cooperation. >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> On Behalf Of Jeff Condit >> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 11:11 AM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Protel EDA Discussion List >> Subject: Re: [PEDA] DXP PCB -> 99SE >> >> Robert, >> >> I don't have DXP up right now but believe P99SE files are version 4. >> Can you try doing a Save-As to version 4? >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Robert Gillatt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "'Protel EDA Discussion List'" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 7:40 AM >> Subject: [PEDA] DXP PCB -> 99SE >> >> >>> Hi, >>> Does anyone know if I can save DXP .pcbdoc files in a format that >> 99SE >>> will >>> recognize. I know, I am a lazy man, but it might save me trying out >> all >>> the >>> variations on the Save As menu. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Rob >>> >>> R`theta Electronics >>> >>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG. >> Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.13/998 - Release Date: >> 9/10/2007 > >> 8:48 AM >> >> > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum > > To Post messages: > mailto:[email protected] > > Unsubscribe and Other Options: > http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com > > Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004): > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current): > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG. > Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.13/998 - Release Date: 9/10/2007 > 8:48 AM > > ____________________________________________________________ You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum To Post messages: mailto:[email protected] Unsubscribe and Other Options: http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004): http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current): http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] ____________________________________________________________ You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum To Post messages: mailto:[email protected] Unsubscribe and Other Options: http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004): http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current): http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
