Soren, list:
I don’t see why you’re having problems with seeing how this is possible without a recognition of the independent reality of embodied conscious subjects living in language and culture. Could you not simply look to the best example that embodies this integration of phaneroscopic metaphysics that is combined with ethics, esthetics, logic; that is combined with tychism, ananchism, agapism (together, synechism); which supports the triadic process of semiotic through pragmaticism? Best, Jerry R On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Søren Brier <[email protected]> wrote: > Jon and list > > > > Difficult question. The choice of phenomenology and to combine it with > pure mathematics is in itself metaphysical. Out of this combination > develops phaneroscopic metaphysics, which develop worlds and which is > again combined with ethic, aesthetics and logic as semiotics. This is again > combined with Tychism, synechism and agapism, which are partly independent > of the three categories but supports the development of the triadic process > semiotics, and his pragmaticism, from which a theory of meaning of a sign > is developed. But I still have problems in seeing how this is possible > without a recognition of the independent reality of embodied conscious > subjects living in language and culture. > > > > Søren > > > > *From:* Jon Alan Schmidt [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* 20. oktober 2016 18:22 > *To:* Søren Brier > *Cc:* Peirce-L > *Subject:* Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Universes and Categories (was Peirce's > Cosmology) > > > > Søren, List: > > > > Are you saying that the Categories are phaneroscopic, while the Universes > are metaphysical? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jon > > > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Søren Brier <[email protected]> wrote: > > I suggest that in a phaneroscopic process ontology the categories will > develop into worlds. > > > > Søren > > > > *From:* Jon Alan Schmidt [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* 20. oktober 2016 15:34 > *To:* Søren Brier > > *Cc:* Peirce-L > *Subject:* Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Universes and Categories (was Peirce's > Cosmology) > > Søren, List: > > SB: I think it is fair to say that the categories do form three distinct > different universes. > > Just to clarify--are you saying that the categories and the universes are > the same? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jon > > > ----------------------------- > PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON > PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to > [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L > but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the > BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm > . > > > > > >
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
