Dear Clark, list:

Well, perhaps it can happen faster if they get some more funding as
Peirce's popularity and awareness of his contribution grows.

Best,
Jerry Rhee

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:11 PM, CLARK GOBLE <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On Oct 25, 2016, at 2:38 PM, Jerry Rhee <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Then for what reason is CP if it is simply an "arbitrarily jumbled
> topical arrangement of the Collected Papers"?
> To arrange papers with solely that purpose appears silly to me.
> Perhaps something is being missed or ignored.
>
> For example, what if our purpose is to find a resolution to a battle of
> names (*c.f.*, *Cratylus*, 438d-439b).  How are we to refer to the
> sections of interest or ought we to reference the entire essay, of which
> there may be different versions?
>
> That is, is it not simpler to say:
> CP 5.189 is better than CP 6.469 and better than CP 5.402?
>
>
> The CP was a fantastic work by Harvard in the day. Up to that point people
> typically had to go to Harvard and go through the collections to read most
> of Peirce. (Derrida famously had to go to Harvard for a year to read much
> of Peirce back in the 50’s) The CP enabled people to actually get the
> lesser known (and arguably more important) works of Peirce. So it’s been a
> huge benefit but has the limits of being that first work and organized
> somewhat thematically.
>
> The Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition is arguably
> much better. But it’s not yet as widely available, so far as I’m aware
> isn’t in an electronic edition yet, and is only up to volume 6 which deals
> with his writings from 1886-1890. Since for most of us it is his post mid
> 90’s work that is most valuable that means we’ll have to wait a while to
> use the series or stick with the EP.
>
>
> -----------------------------
> PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
> PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to
> [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L
> but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the
> BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm
> .
>
>
>
>
>
>
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to