Jon,

Away from home now but if you search the InterSciWiki site for “Doctrine of 
Individuals” I think there is a collection of excerpts and comments.

Regards,

Jon

http://inquiryintoinquiry.com

> On Jan 7, 2017, at 5:49 PM, Jon Alan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> List:
> 
> I have been reading up on Peirce's version of scholastic realism and his 
> opposition to various forms of nominalism.  He seems to have consistently 
> preferred the term "general" to "universal" (e.g., CP 2.367); has anyone ever 
> tried to figure out why?  In a new book, Peirce's Empiricism:  Its Roots and 
> Its Originality, Aaron Bruce Wilson suggests that "it might be that he thinks 
> 'general' is a better translation of Aristotle's katholou," or because "laws 
> are the type of generals his realism emphasizes the most," and "propositions 
> expressing such laws are not universal propositions ... but are general 
> propositions which can admit of exceptions" (p. 51).
> 
> On the flip side, "universal" is usually contrasted with "particular," while 
> "general" is opposed to "singular."  All of these identify types of 
> propositions--singular when the subject is determinate, general when it is 
> indeterminate; and the latter further divided into universal (all) and 
> particular (some).  Finally, Peirce described continuity as a higher type of 
> generality, and contrasted it with individuality; specifically, individuals 
> are actualized from a continuum of potentiality.
> 
> Any further insights on these terminological distinctions would be 
> appreciated.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
> Professional Engineer, Amateur Philosopher, Lutheran Layman
> www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt - twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to