Stephen: I understand your point about triadic thinking. All cognitive 
processes operate as a triad. But, how does your system deal with the 
psychological, which is not amenable that easily to reason, to mediation, but 
is more kinetically reactive? How does your system deal with the raw emotions?

Edwina
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Stephen C. Rose 
  To: Peirce List 
  Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2017 3:26 PM
  Subject: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce, Wittgenstein and what cannot be said


  Peirce is said to be a superficial and less than apt theologian. Not one of 
the things he is cited for. I think he and Wittgenstein are peas in a pod right 
down to their common reliance on, and iconoclasm toward, the natural sciences. 
It was Wittgenstein who noted the difficulty of dealing with what I have for 
years called the realm of mystery and supposition.He called it nonsense in a 
positive way. And I agree with those who say his reason was to protect ethics 
and religion. 


  As one with theological training who has gone far toward reconstructing a 
theology outside the camp, there being no antidote to banishment for career 
decisions such as fighting for reparations in the 60s and favoring Saul 
Alinsky, I think Peirce has made THE fundamental contribution needed not only 
for religion but for the world generally. That is triadic thinking understood 
as a means of making the unspeakable sayable and normative. 


  I have had no access to circles within the Peirce community and have been 
excluded and skewered by some for whatever reason. But I do want to make this 
point about Peirce and Wittgenstein. Though neither man was a theologian, 
together they are the future of any universal and nonviolent and ethically 
advanced religious thinking. The simplest way to  say this is to say that 
binary thinking in any form when applied to Wittgenstein's unsayable is 
anathema to progress while triadic thinking is the key to progress. 


  amazon.com/author/stephenrose



------------------------------------------------------------------------------



  -----------------------------
  PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON 
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with 
the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to