List: I am a bit puzzled by this suggestion.
Concordance? “Order” (inferring numerical order and mathematics? “Index" as a categorization? Are propositions inferred by “concordances”? Or what is the glue that binds the three concepts together? Can anyone expand on this proposal? Cheers Jerry > On Mar 13, 2017, at 1:02 PM, E Valentine Daniel <e...@columbia.edu> wrote: > > Dear Jon and Peirces, > I propose that we complete the customary (incomplete/dyadic) theories of > truth, viz., by consensus and by correspondence, by adding, Truth by > "concordance" (what you, Jon, call "triple correspondence"). > val daniel > > E. Valentine Daniel > Professor of Anthropology > 958 Schermerhorn Ext., > Columbia University > New York, 10027 > > (917) 741-7764 > e...@columbia.edu > >> On Mar 13, 2017, at 9:00 AM, Jon Awbrey <jawb...@att.net> wrote: >> >> Peircers, >> >> Looking over these old articles it occurs to me >> there may be a few bits in them worth salvaging, >> so I started a blog series for attempting that: >> >> https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2017/03/11/pragmatic-theory-of-truth-%e2%80%a2-1/ >> >> I think John Sowa's remarks about the “major failures caused by ignoring >> [Peirce]” >> and Jerry Chandler's remarks about later readings serving as a “Procrustian >> bed >> for CSP's concepts” are very apt in this context, and I will have more to say >> in that regard if I can get to it. >> >> Regards, >> >> Jon >> >> On 3/10/2017 4:18 PM, Jon Awbrey wrote: >>> Peircers, >>> >>> I haven't looked at these articles since the days I wasted >>> trying to justify the ways of Peirce to Wikipediots, other >>> than to reformat them a little here and there, but some of >>> their material may be instructive for ongoing discussions, >>> especially the quotes from Peirce and Kant on the nominal >>> character of truth definitions in terms of correspondence. >>> To make the shortest possible shrift, I think we have to >>> keep in mind that “correspondence” for Peirce can mean >>> “triple correspondence”, in other words, just another >>> name for a triadic relation. >>> >>> Note. The document histories of these InterSciWiki forks >>> tell me that these drafts derive from Wikipedia revisions >>> of 14 Feb 2007 and 29 Jun 2006, respectively. >>> >>> http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/Pragmatic_theory_of_truth >>> >>> http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/Correspondence_theory_of_truth >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Jon >>> >> >> -- >> >> inquiry into inquiry: https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/ >> academia: https://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey >> oeiswiki: https://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey >> isw: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/JLA >> facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache >> >> ----------------------------- >> PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON >> PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to >> peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but >> to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of >> the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm . >> >> >> >> > > > > ----------------------------- > PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON > PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu > . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu > with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at > http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm . > > > >
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
