On 7/28/2017 5:07 PM, [email protected] wrote:
when [Peirce] uses “intentional” in an ordinary context, it means
pretty much the same as it typically does in ordinary usage today.
For instance, CP 1.334 (c. 1905)...

Yes.  And note the definition of 'intentional' that he wrote
for the _Century Dictionary_ (1889):
"1. Done with intention, design, or purpose;intended;designed."

See http://www.jfsowa.com/peirce/defs/intention.jpg

John

-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to