List, Jon:

> On Apr 1, 2019, at 7:05 PM, Jon Alan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I am afraid that I do not understand your questions.  What conjecture? 

The sentence:
> I suspect that those difficulties are what forced him back to treating a Cut 
> as negation and a Line of Identity that appears to cross one as a Ligature 
> instead.
can be considered to be a conjecture.
The meaning I intended to communicate can be related to this sentence by a 
simple substitution:
Replace "I suspect” 
with “A conjecture is”

The sentence 
"I have not said anything at all about graph theory, lexical fields, or set 
theory.”
appears to me to be surprising  in the context of this list and recent 
discussions.

Nevertheless, 
by “lexical field” is simply a collection of words that can be associated with 
any expression of any author. 
by “graph theory” I mean a theory of diagrams that associates meanings with the 
components of the diagram.
by "set theory", I am referring to that branch of logic and mathematics 
proposed by G. Cantor and which many now believe is the logical basis of 
mathematics.
Is that helpful?

I did not mean to be obtuse.

Cheers

Jerry



 
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to