Robert and Jon,
To determine whether students understand a topic,
teachers often ask them to explain it in their own words.  Since much of
Peirce's terminology is radically different from common usage today, it
would be a good exercise to translate or at least explain his comments in
21st c. English.
For example, consider Jon's
point:
JAS> Again, Peirce
explicitly defines
"the commens" as "that mind into which the minds of utterer
and
interpreter have to be fused in order that any communication should take
 place ... It consists of all that is, and must be, well understood
between utterer and interpreter, at the outset, in order that the sign
in question
 should fulfill its function" (EP 2:478, 1906, bold added).  In other
words, the commens is clearly not "universal" and
"independent of all
these minds"; on the contrary, it is the one mind into which
two or more minds are "welded" or "fused" by one
sign.
Peirce's use of the words 'mind' and 'fuse' is
highly unusual.  I don't believe that anyone other than Peirce has ever
used those two words to explain how people communicate.  
For the
word 'it' in "It consists of all that
is, and must be, well understood
between utterer and interpreter, at the outset, in order that the sign
in question
 should fulfill its function", consider the following
substitutions:
(1) presupposition.  (2) background knowledge.  (3)
common assumptions.  (4) cultural background.  (5) experience with the
subject matter.
Are any of those five phrases (or some combination
of two or more) sufficient to explain how utterer and interpreter can
understand one another?  
If not, why not?   If so, what aspects of
the answer correspond to Peirce's use of the words 'mind' and
'fuse'?
In fact, Peirce's own ethics of terminology would require
him to tailor his terminology to the common usage of the day.  I doubt
that Peirce himself would continue to talk about fusing minds if he were
among us.
John
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON 
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . 
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] 
with no subject, and with the sole line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of 
the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
► PEIRCE-L is owned by The PEIRCE GROUP;  moderated by Gary Richmond;  and 
co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

Reply via email to