Dear Jerry : Google is your friend : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finitary_relation Please note that Peirce's name appears on this page. Your "demonstration" on the chemical combinations between atoms shows above all your ignorance of mathematical modelling in chemistry. The terms "logic of relatives" have 130 occurrences in the CP ... and I'm not talking about the five volumes of NEM...... Robert
Le mer. 15 juil. 2020 à 06:41, Jerry LR Chandler < jerry_lr_chand...@icloud.com> a écrit : > Jon, List: > > On Jul 13, 2020, at 8:09 PM, Jon Alan Schmidt <jonalanschm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > While refraining from posting over the last couple of weeks, I have been > reflecting on my overall approach to Peirce's writings. Some > participants seem to contend that the *only* valid interpretations of > them are those that follow *deductively* from his verbatim statements. By > contrast, I generally formulate interpretative *hypotheses* and then > assess whether and how well they hold up in light of Peirce's actual words. > After all, consider the following passage from a discarded draft of his > seventh 1903 Harvard Lecture, "Pragmatism as the Logic of Abduction." > > > Your writings of CSP writings over the past several years are a remarkable > contribution to understanding the meanings of the scripts. > Keep up the excellent work. It could be improved by engaging in the > broader concepts needed to bring the propositional logics of chemistry and > grammars of various scientific languages such that emergence is a natural > consequence. > > Recent comments about your work are appalling. From my perspective, CSP’s > logic is radically different from the hubris of the mathematical community. > The system of signs, indices and symbols created by chemists to interpret > interpret the logics of material form and material changes challenge the > mathematics community’s notions of relations and logic operations. The > simple notion that hydrogen and oxygen compose to form water or that the > sugars (carbohydrates) are composed of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen amply > demonstrates incompleteness of tradition logics of mathematics! > > Cheers > > Jerry > > . > >
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with no subject, and with the sole line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by The PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.
