Gary F> For me at least, “veracity” only applies to stories or
propositions that are publicly verifiable.  
But a huge amount of
information that we get every day is reported by people whose observations
cannot be  verified by any other sources.  When your friends or family
discuss their experiences, they rarely have photographic evidence or other
confirming sources about what they did or saw.
Over time, we learn
that some people are more reliable or truthful than others.  We also learn
that people whose reports are usually truthful may hide or distort some
issues that may be painful or embarrassing.
For dreams and feelings,
the subject's introspective reports are the only sources for the details. 
But neuroscientists have found those reports to be extremely valuable for
interpreting the data they receive from brain scans.
Modern
technology can provide important resources for enhancing the science of
phaneroscopy.
John
Gary F> For me at least, “veracity” only applies to stories or propositions that are publicly verifiable.  But a huge amount of information that we get every day is reported by people whose observations cannot be  verified by any other sources.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON 
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . 
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] 
with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the message and nothing in the 
body.  More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html .
► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP;  moderated by Gary Richmond;  and 
co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

Reply via email to