If vaporware affects behavior then it is less vaporous on that account. We measure consumption in terms of the prices of what is consumed (possibly including shadow prices of intangibles), so why not measure net worth changes by the prices of capital? How else would you measure wealth, or anything? mbs Max Sawicky wrote: >Income is consumption plus the change in net worth. >Obviously NIPA does it differently. To persons, yes. But economy-wide, if there's no production to offset it, it's just vaporware. Doug
- Economics Reporting Review by Dean Baker, 5/21/01 Robert Naiman
- Keynesian economics 101 David Shemano
- Re: Keynesian economics 101 Jim Devine
- RE: Re: Keynesian economics 101 Max Sawicky
- Re: RE: Re: Keynesian economics 101 Jim Devine
- Re: RE: Re: Keynesian economics 101 Doug Henwood
- RE: Re: RE: Re: Keynesian economics... Max Sawicky
- Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Keynesian e... Doug Henwood
- Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re:... Max Sawicky
- Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re:... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Key... Jim Devine
- Vaporware Michael Perelman
- Re: Vaporware Doug Henwood
- monetary policy Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Vaporware Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Vaporware Doug Henwood
- Re: Vaporware Carrol Cox
- Origination of Capitalism David Shemano
- Re: Origination of Capitali... Louis Proyect
