At 11:15 AM 5/22/01 -0400, you wrote: >Max Sawicky wrote: > >>Income is consumption plus the change in net worth. >>Obviously NIPA does it differently. Doug writes: >To persons, yes. But economy-wide, if there's no production to offset it, >it's just vaporware. also, note that it's _change in_ net worth that contributes to income, not the _level_ of net worth that does so. Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
- Economics Reporting Review by Dean Baker, 5/21/01 Robert Naiman
- Keynesian economics 101 David Shemano
- Re: Keynesian economics 101 Jim Devine
- RE: Re: Keynesian economics 101 Max Sawicky
- Re: RE: Re: Keynesian economics 101 Jim Devine
- Re: RE: Re: Keynesian economics 101 Doug Henwood
- RE: Re: RE: Re: Keynesian economics... Max Sawicky
- Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Keynesian e... Doug Henwood
- RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Key... Max Sawicky
- Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re:... Doug Henwood
- Vaporware Jim Devine
- Vaporware Michael Perelman
- Re: Vaporware Doug Henwood
- monetary policy Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Vaporware Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Vaporware Doug Henwood
- Re: Vaporware Carrol Cox
- Origination of Capitalism David Shemano
- Re: Origination of Capitali... Louis Proyect
- Re: Origination of Capital... Michael Perelman
- RE: Re: Origination of Cap... David Shemano
