I should have noted that the text of the "boxes" on each of the famed economists accompanying the article were by Romer, not the author of the article. I wrote: A few years ago, Paul Romer was on the cover of, I think it was "Forbes, Jr.", apparently a special Forbes Mag for college kids. The picture was accompanied by something like "Future Nobel Prize?" As part of the article, there were a few paragraphs each on Keynes, Schumpeter, Marshall, and I think either Marx or Smith. It was all fairly infuriating, first because of the omissions, then the tone, and also the content. First prize I think still goes to Stiglitz and Shapiro's "Equilibrium Unemployment as a Worker Discipline Device" in the American Economic Review where the term "reserve army" was used, with no mention of Marx in the article or bibliography. Mat
- RE: A Krugman Klassic Forstater, Mathew
- Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic Peter Dorman
- Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic Jim Devine
- Re: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic Michael Yates
- Re: A Krugman Klassic Jim Devine
- Re: A Krugman Klassic Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic Brad De Long
- RE: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic Forstater, Mathew
- Re: RE: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic Forstater, Mathew
- Re: Re: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic enilsson
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic JKSCHW
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic Michael Yates
- Re: A Krugman Klassic Michael Perelman
- RE: Re: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic Forstater, Mathew
- Re: A Krugman Klassic Jim Devine
- RE: Re: A Krugman Klassic Forstater, Mathew
- Re: RE: Re: A Krugman Klassic Michael Perelman
- Re: RE: Re: A Krugman Klassic Brad DeLong
- Re: Re: RE: Re: A Krugman Klassic Doug Henwood
