In a message dated 10/9/00 1:08:57 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << And so what do the two Pauls (PK & PS) conclude about Adam Smith -- a minor pre- Ricardian? >> PS is remembered for this stupid crackn about Marx, but it was not his cionsidered view. He wrote several classic papers on Marxian value theory in the late 60s, so he must have thought it worth his while. --jks
- Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic Peter Dorman
- Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic Jim Devine
- Re: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic Michael Yates
- Re: A Krugman Klassic Jim Devine
- Re: A Krugman Klassic Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic Brad De Long
- RE: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic Forstater, Mathew
- Re: RE: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic Jim Devine
- RE: RE: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic Forstater, Mathew
- Re: Re: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic enilsson
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic JKSCHW
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic Michael Yates
- Re: A Krugman Klassic Michael Perelman
- RE: Re: Re: RE: A Krugman Klassic Forstater, Mathew
- Re: A Krugman Klassic Jim Devine
- RE: Re: A Krugman Klassic Forstater, Mathew
- Re: RE: Re: A Krugman Klassic Michael Perelman
- Re: RE: Re: A Krugman Klassic Brad DeLong
- Re: Re: RE: Re: A Krugman Klassic Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: A Krugman Klassic Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: A Krugman Klass... Doug Henwood