Re: Re: voting for Nader

[J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.]

Michael,
      In fact, the big one on that probably was
abortion.  Maybe they would have appointed
more Souters to the Supreme Court rather than
Ginsburg and Breyer.  Neither of those is nearly
as progressive as the Ford-appointed Stevens.
But, put anti-abortion justices in instead of Ginsburg
and Breyer and we would have a very different situation
right now with regard to abortion rights, I think.  He
does not get any credit it for it, but the likelihood that
a Bush victory probably will not undo this, is in fact
a sign of how important the 1992 outcome was.
Barkley Rosser
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, November 03, 2000 5:45 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:3931] Re: voting for Nader


>> Would progressive movements have been better off today if we had just had
>> 8 years of Bush/Dole?
>> Eric
>
>yes...   Michael Hoover
>
>