On Thursday, October 25, 2001 at 13:22:33 (-0700) Rakesh Bhandari writes: >i want to be clear that my characterization of the chomsky criticism launched >by hitchens-georgia rondas-andrew hagen-leo casey as misguided, cynical and >perverse in no way implies that i think chomsky is above crititism. > >*i don't think wm lear on pen-l was effective in rebutting the charge that >chomsky had misanalyzed what the costs were and who had borne them in the >Marshall plan. wm lear relied on marcello dececco to defend chomsky; it seems >to differ from the more defensible account in anthony tuo-kofi gadzey's >political economy of power.
For the record, I believe I actually relied upon Eric Helleiner, not De Cecco. Bill
