Drewk wrote: > > Justin, Gil, Michael, Doug: > > I am still waiting for my questions and challenges to be answered. > If you can refute me, do so. If not, admit that you cannot. > That is not how maillists work or ought to work. I've added people to my kill file who got too insistent that their arguments should be responded to or that others should read the articles they base their arguments on. On a maillist one responds to the posts that one chooses to respond to, pretty arbitrarily. Obligation of this sort belongs in the classroom. Carrol
- Re: RE: Re: Re: marx's proof regarding surpl... Rakesh Bhandari
- RE: marx's proof regarding surplus value... Drewk
- Re: RE: marx's proof regarding surp... Rakesh Bhandari
- RE: RE: Re: Re: marx's proof regarding surpl... Max Sawicky
- RE: marx's proof regarding surplus value and... Drewk
- Re: RE: marx's proof regarding surplus v... Michael Perelman
- Re: RE: marx's proof regarding surplus v... Rakesh Bhandari
- Re: Re: RE: marx's proof regarding surpl... Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: RE: marx's proof regarding ... Michael Perelman
- RE: marx's proof regarding surplus value and p... Drewk
- Re: RE: marx's proof regarding surplus value... Michael Perelman
- marx's proof regarding surplus value and profit Charles Brown
- Re: marx's proof regarding surplus value and profit Gil Skillman
- Re: RE: marx's proof regarding surplus value and profit Justin Schwartz
- marx's proof regarding surplus value and profit Charles Brown
- marx's proof regarding surplus value and profit Charles Brown